Get Google Ads For Free? Are the various GetGoogleAdsFree Sites scams?
We wondered too. So, I checked it out, and wrote a post, seeking to warm those who may have thought they would get free Google Adwords ads for free, that they would get no such thing.
In actual fact, as I understand it, the basic premise is to pay for advertising, but make more money from those who land on your page as a result than it cost you to get them there. This idea is called “arbitrage,” and is what anyone who advertises their products and services on Google should be trying to do!
Do you suppose that when Ebay advertise on Google to attract more people to use their auction sites, they consider their ads to be free? How come, since they make a profit? By the logic of this system, if you subtract the costs of your advertising from the amount you make from your site and you have a surplus, you have got your ads for free! You haven’t. You have paid for them.
Have a look at the original “Get Google Ads Free is a complete scam” post for more details.
When doing so, be sure to read the comments from the laughable attorney, who begins by making loosely veiled threats, goes on to state that he will say no more on the matter, then concocts some strange angle out of the ether in and effort to discredit us by saying we are “antisemitic.”
Where on earth these hateful allusions stem from I have no idea! I had never even considered to which religious denomination anyone associated with this site may belong. In fact, judging by the (un?)ethicical business practices in which they are engaged, any reference to religion is entirely confusing, and not one I would ever have made.
Having said this, when all your cards have been played, and failed, the final “race” card may be attempted as a ‘trump’ in time of extreme desperation. This deplorable tactic is one which I would like to rise above, though I shall put on record, right now, that I have no religious allegiance, and do not judge anyone for whatever faith they choose to take. I take people as I find them: if you seek to profit by sewing confusion, I’ll try to clarify things in an effort to redress the balance.
If you have to pay, it isn’t free.






Well that dispute was laugh out loud funny! I’m not a lawyer but could someone please clear this up for me? Since this was a dispute which was (past tense as i consider it to be over) international in scope, would that make it under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court? Or would Rob and Linda have to be extradited to face charges in the US? Considering they are not American citizens how would one go about pressing charges? Maybe the CIA could help out here. Time for some “extraordinary rendition” perhaps? Incidentally, this is not an “anti-American” comment, i’m merely highlighting the ridiculous nature of the argument set out by Levin. But i would appreciate it if someone could clear this up for me.
I’m not exactly sure, given that there were several spurious arguments scattered around, roughly interspersed with some legal terminology.
At first I thought this person was suggesting a civil action, however, then they described my actions as “felonious.” A felony is of course a criminal offence (a very serious one). For a felony, there is every chance that one may be extradited, depending upon which country he or she is in, and the seriousness of the offence.
For a civil action, there really is no obligation to show up, though if you do set foot on American soil, they may serve you with papers, or a judgment
made in your absence.
I think the International Criminal Court has more pressing matters to consider.
However, where the latter comments came from, I have no idea. What you didn’t see is that the same person attempted to make comments which linked to animal pornography and other sites which are illegal for some people to view. This behaviour suggests not the work of a lawyer, but a simpleton.
That, and making comments which incite religious and/or racial hatred in a public forum, is illegal. There are several bodies both in the UK and the US who are responsible for the growing area of cyber-crime. All information and communications ever received from this individual, as well as all identifying details, have been passed on to them.