Every day I have the dubious pleasure of reading yet more irrelevant comment which shirks the original questions I raised, when calling the product in question a scam.

Does “Dr Jon Cohen” give money to charity? IRRELEVANT.

Does the product provide useful information? IRRELEVANT.

Do they give refunds? IRRELEVANT.

Can you get Google advertising for free? NO, categorically, NO, you cannot.

The rationale used to explain this one away by all of the people who have attempted to (many of whom, I’m sure, may be interested in the continued success of this product), is akin to this final analogy:

Imagine if I set up in business offering people “Free Ferrari’s”, only, once they have PAID me to join the “Free Ferrari Club” all I actually provide them with is a method to make money, which, coincidentally, also relies on the club member providing a not insubstantial sum of money in order to stand a chance of making any. The whole premise of my business would be reliant upon a falsehood.

“Heavy” or otherwise, people over here are commtting acts of fraud by saying outright lies, lies, lies.

Yet, the site in question is refered to as a scam when Google itself APPROVED them.

I wish humanity had some “humanity.”

Exhausting!

This is the funniest blog I have read for a long time.

Like most other people I have heard about this kind of product (Free Google Ads) for a while now, and have spent the day checking it out to see if it’s a product for me.

It’s pitched on some search engine / sites as being a free secret. Simply follow these questions and click here to find out more -blah blah! But like everything else, the more testimonies and sale guff that you are subjected to the more “hard selling” this site is actually doing to get you on board to inevitably buy it.

The most important thing is that the site, sales guff and so called testimonies are all misleading, and once that happens then yes people will put up their defences.

To be honest i’m actually not surprised at all that Ms J Levin is acting on behalf of the that site as she seems as dodgy as the website itself.

Good lawyers are professional and don’t type like they learnt their law from their “Legal talk for Dummies” book.

If something looks to good to be true then it generally is.

And for those reasons, i’m out!

P.s The guy who wrote this and the “distributing company” are from Sweden, so why would a yank be involved..!?

As for me making money from reselling the ebook, I am not an affiliate and do I do not promote it, I don’t have a vested interest in it.

And for charlatan, I make my living from Internet marketing after much perseverance, failure and money loss so I do write from actual experience.

And in my post, I did say that the title could be misleading I don’t dispute that.

The sales letter; the name or the website: the whole system is deceitful. A con. A scam.

Does the person(s) responsible for producing this ebook and website make money from it? Do their affiliates? Will you make money from re-selling it? In all probability, yes, you will.

But does that make it ethical? Does the fact you make a lot of money (irrespective of whether or not you claim to give some or all of that to a charity, Richard) make your method of doing so honest, or legitimate? Does the fact that you offer a refund mean that you are entitled to lie in your sales letter, because anyone who exposes the lie can “get their money back”?

Have you ever heard of the South Sea Bubble?

Graham, I’m afraid to say, you are a complete charlatan. Get some class. That’s free.

I totally disagree with selling on peoples email addresses for profit. People join lists in good faith and it’s a betrayal of that good faith to sell or pass on their details.

I know that my newsletter subscribers certainly wouldn’t appreciate me passing on their details.